Feature Comparison Slide Template
Grid Table comparing 2-5 products or options across a list of features. Each cell shows a checkmark (included), dash (not included), or text value (counts, plan names, etc.). Clean consulting visual for vendor evaluation, product comparison, and feature gap analysis.
Try in PlaygroundParameters
Example brief
Compare Slack vs Teams vs Discord on messaging, video calls, file sharing, screen sharing, integrations, SSO, compliance, API access, mobile app.
API example
With a brief (async, $0.05)
curl -X POST https://api.slideforge.dev/v1/render \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sf_live_..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"template": "bbf02b05-7f8c-5463-89ab-c8b0e8b7f699",
"brief": "Compare Slack vs Teams vs Discord on messaging, video calls, file sharing, scree..."
}'With structured params (sync, $0.03)
curl -X POST https://api.slideforge.dev/v1/render \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sf_live_..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"template": "bbf02b05-7f8c-5463-89ab-c8b0e8b7f699",
"params": {
"title": "Collaboration Platform Comparison — Slack leads on integrations",
"products": [
"Slack",
"Teams",
"Discord"
],
"features": [
{
"label": "Real-time messaging",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"true"
]
},
{
"label": "Video conferencing",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"true"
]
},
{
"label": "Screen sharing",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"true"
]
},
{
"label": "File sharing (25GB+)",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"false"
]
},
{
"label": "Enterprise SSO",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"false"
]
},
{
"label": "SOC2 compliance",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"false"
]
},
{
"label": "3rd-party integrations",
"values": [
"2,400+",
"700+",
"Limited"
]
},
{
"label": "API access",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"true"
]
},
{
"label": "Guest access",
"values": [
"true",
"true",
"true"
]
},
{
"label": "Custom workflows",
"values": [
"Workflow Builder",
"Power Automate",
"false"
]
}
],
"takeaway": "Slack leads on integrations (2,400+); Teams wins on bundled M365 value; Discord lacks enterprise features."
}
}'Tags
Related templates
Before / After Comparison
Two-panel from-state to-state comparison with bottom synthesis. Each side is a Card with label + bullet body. The bottom Callout carries the synthesis (what the transformation enables / what it costs). Used for operating-model change, process redesign, tooling consolidation.
Comparison Matrix
Matrix comparing 2-6 items across multiple criteria using Harvey balls (0-4 filled circles). Rows are criteria, columns are items. Best for vendor evaluation, competitive analysis, feature-by-feature comparison.
Competitive Landscape
Competitive positioning slide with a 2x2 market map and a disciplined insight column. Best for vendor landscapes, market segmentation, and prioritization grids where the viewer needs the implication, not only dots.
Pricing Table
Side-by-side pricing tiers with plan names, prices, fit descriptions, feature lists, and an optional recommended tier. Best for SaaS packaging, vendor options, and commercial decision slides.
Frequently asked questions
How do I render a Feature Comparison slide?
Send a POST request to /v1/render with template "bbf02b05-7f8c-5463-89ab-c8b0e8b7f699" and your data in the params field. The response includes a .pptx download URL and PNG preview. Template renders cost $0.03 and complete in under 1 second.
What data does the Feature Comparison template accept?
The Feature Comparison template accepts: title, products, features, takeaway. Supports 2-5 items. See the parameter reference below for details.
Can I customize the colors and fonts of this template?
Yes — pass a theme_id parameter to apply your custom brand colors, fonts, and logo. SlideForge has 8 built-in themes, or you can create custom themes via the Themes API.
Try this template
Render a Feature Comparison slide in under 1 second. $3 free credit, no card required.