Graded-fit scorecard

Compare four operating models against eight criteria

Try in Playground
Graded-fit scorecard slide template rendered with SlideForge
Cost
$0.05/slide
Engine
Deterministic
Pattern
Comparison Matrix
Output
.pptx + PDF + PNG

Example brief

I need a slide that compares Central, Federated, Hub & spoke, and Decentralized operating models against eight criteria: Time to value, Governance control, Asset reuse, Business ownership, Security oversight, Talent scalability, Cost transparency, and Innovation speed, with scores ranging from 1 to 4, highlighting that Hub & spoke model balances speed with control and noting that fully Decentralized model should be avoided for regulated workloads.

Render it

Brief path

curl -X POST https://api.slideforge.dev/v1/render/auto \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sf_live_..." \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{ "brief": "I need a slide that compares Central, Federated, Hub & spoke, and Decentralized operating models against eight criteria:" }'

Structured intent (this template)

{
  "pattern": "comparison_matrix",
  "title": "Four operating models scored against eight criteria",
  "subtitle": "Degree of fit, 0-4",
  "matrix_kind": "graded_fit",
  "columns": [
    {
      "name": "Central"
    },
    {
      "name": "Federated"
    },
    {
      "name": "Hub & spoke",
      "emphasis": "primary"
    },
    {
      "name": "Decentralized"
    }
  ],
  "rows": [
    {
      "label": "Time to value",
      "cells": [
        "1",
        "3",
        "3",
        "4"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Governance control",
      "cells": [
        "4",
        "2",
        "3",
        "1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Asset reuse",
      "cells": [
        "4",
        "2",
        "3",
        "1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Business ownership",
      "cells": [
        "1",
        "4",
        "3",
        "4"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Security oversight",
      "cells": [
        "4",
        "2",
        "3",
        "1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Talent scalability",
      "cells": [
        "2",
        "3",
        "3",
        "2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Cost transparency",
      "cells": [
        "3",
        "2",
        "3",
        "1"
      ]
    },
    {
      "label": "Innovation speed",
      "cells": [
        "2",
        "4",
        "3",
        "4"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "takeaway": "Hub-and-spoke balances speed with control; avoid fully decentralized for regulated workloads."
}

Related templates

Frequently asked questions

How do I render the Graded-fit scorecard template?

Send a POST to /v1/render/auto with a brief, or call create_slide via MCP with the structured intent shown below. The response includes an editable .pptx, a PDF, and a PNG. $0.05 per slide.

Does an AI write the slide?

No. SlideForge renders deterministically from a structured intent — no LLM draws the slide, so text is never mangled or fabricated. The optional brief path uses a router to pick the pattern, then renders deterministically.

Can I customize the colors and fonts?

Yes. Pass a theme_id to apply a built-in or custom brand theme; the layout stays the same.

Try this template

Render Graded-fit scorecard deterministically — editable PowerPoint in under a second.

Graded-fit scorecard Slide Template | SlideForge | SlideForge (slideforge.dev)